Download PDF Let's Get Free: A Hip-Hop Theory of Justice, by Paul Butler
Allow's take a look at the sources that constantly offer favorable things. Impacts can be the factors of how individuals life runs. To get one of the sources, you can find the interesting point to obtain. Exactly what's that? Schedule! Yeah, publication is the most effective device that can be used for affecting your life. Schedule will certainly not assure you to be fantastic individuals, yet when you read the book and also undertake the favorable points, you will certainly be a fantastic individual.
Let's Get Free: A Hip-Hop Theory of Justice, by Paul Butler
Download PDF Let's Get Free: A Hip-Hop Theory of Justice, by Paul Butler
Residing in this new period will intend you to constantly compete with others. Among the modal to contend is the idea, mind, as well as understanding included experience that on by someone. To deal with this problem, everybody should have much better understanding, minds, and assumed. It is to feel competed with the others, obviously in doing the generosity as well as this life to be much better. Among the manner ins which can be done is by reading.
Having a new publication in long times will certainly make you really feel so happy with you. You should be proud when you can set aside the money to buy the book. However, lots of people are really unusual to do this way. To conquer the proper way of analysis, Let's Get Free: A Hip-Hop Theory Of Justice, By Paul Butler is presented in soft documents. Also this is only the soft data; you can get it a lot easier and also faster compared to buying it in the store.
The Let's Get Free: A Hip-Hop Theory Of Justice, By Paul Butler will certainly likewise plant you great way to reach your ideal. When it comes true for you, you can read it in your extra time. Why don't you try it? Really, you will unknown just how exactly this publication will certainly be, unless you check out. Although you don't have much time to finish this publication promptly, it in fact doesn't need to complete hurriedly. Pick your priceless free time to make use of to read this publication.
This is exactly what you have to perform in needing exactly what we offer. This is not nonsense, this is something to produce better idea. Primarily, book will not constantly influent somebody to act as well as think much better. It will certainly rely on exactly how the people will stare and also think of the lesson provided by the book. Yet, when you have actually managed checking out guide organized, the Let's Get Free: A Hip-Hop Theory Of Justice, By Paul Butler will have no matter to require.
Review
"Useful analyses and original suggestions regarding the debate about how best to incarcerate fewer people . . . a debate that should have begun years ago." —California Lawyer "[A] masterpiece in the literature of American criminal justice." —Bookforum "An intriguing volume . . . the building block for future scholarship and conversations about racial issues affecting real people." —LA Daily Journal "Provides a framework of solutions to a stressed and broken justice system that is in need of reform." —purepolitics.com "A can’t-put-it-down call to action from a progressive former prosecutor. Butler’s take on controversial topics like snitching and drug legalization is provocative . . . smart and very entertaining." —Danny Glover "A fresh and thought-provoking perspective on the war on drugs, snitches, and whether locking so many people up really makes Americans safer." —Anthony Romero, executive director, American Civil Liberties Union
Read more
About the Author
A former federal prosecutor, Paul Butler is the country’s leading expert on jury nullification. He provides legal commentary for CNN, NPR, and the Fox News Network, and has been featured on 60 Minutes and profiled in the Washington Post. He has written for the Post, the Boston Globe, and the Los Angeles Times, and is a law professor at George Washington University in Washington, D.C.
Read more
Product details
Paperback: 224 pages
Publisher: The New Press (June 1, 2010)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 1595585001
ISBN-13: 978-1595585004
Product Dimensions:
5.4 x 0.6 x 8.1 inches
Shipping Weight: 9.6 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
Average Customer Review:
4.3 out of 5 stars
40 customer reviews
Amazon Best Sellers Rank:
#157,086 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
I love Paul Butler and greatly respect his work as an attorney, but this is a subpar piece of writing; and I'm surprised that he wrote it, given how outstanding he is in all other parts of his legal career. Citations are too few and far-between to make it good legal writing; large swaths of the book are conclusions presented as arguments, only sometimes having any support whatsoever, and oftentimes the support given is purely anecdotal; and the book overall is a strange combination of nonfiction and memoir. I wish his editor encouraged him to pick between the two. As a piece of writing, it's just very hard to get through--and that's coming from a reader who very much enjoys reading texts in this field. This is a good example of the exact antithesis of a page-turner, which is unfortunate because, again, the topics are so important.I did learn a thing or two from the book, but few (if any) of the arguments Butler makes are particularly novel. The chapter that comes closest to presenting something new is that on the connection between criminal justice and hip-hop culture; though that part begins with an exciting few pages, the argument does not come across as fully developed. I think he could have gone deeper on that thesis. (It's odd that he made that argument the thesis--and title--of his book, too, given that it occupies such a small space in the book itself.)If you're looking for something good on the problems of the criminal justice system, I'd try Michelle Alexander's "The New Jim Crow" instead (or other beautifully written and formidably reasoned texts like James Forman Jr.'s "Locking Up Our Own").
Fortunately C.W. Day has given a detailed review of Butler's book. That helps a lot, because I'm having trouble knowing where to start in expressing appreciation for it. What I want to know is why there are so few reviews? This is important! It should have a wide audience.So why did I give it only four stars rather than five? Because I take issue with the statement on page 124, "Punishment should be the point of criminal justice, but it should be limited by the impact it has on the entire community." Everything he's said in the book would lead me to assume he has a different goal. As an enthusiast for the Restorative Practices movement, I believe, and I infer that he really believes as well, that punishment may serve a goal of individual and social justice, but is not a goal in itself. That takes us right back to the damage done by the focus on retribution, inflicting pain for pain, which has led us to the "Get tough on crime" thing in the first place. As he so aptly points out, getting "tough on crime" is nothing of the sort. It's "getting tough on criminals," which, as he points out, has the effect of increasing crime. On page 19 he says, "There is a tipping point at which crime increases if too many people are incarcerated. The United States is past this point. If we lock up fewer people, we will be safer." This point is elaborated on p. 25 by his pointing out that "Now, the United States has the largest rate of incarceration in the history of the free world."Interestingly, evidence from sources other than Butler's book suggests that the rate of imprisonment is directly related to the decision to privatize prisons. I recall a friend of mine - a former state administrator of probation - saying at the time, "Just watch. The rate of imprisonment will go up now that private ownership has to fill the beds." Toward the end of his book, Butler reflects on the advantage of alternatives like electronic monitoring. I was interested that he noted that these devices are produced by private enterprise. Given the importance of economics in our culture, perhaps this will be an opportunity to increase the involvement of private enterprise in a positive way - sort of the equivalent of green industry.I learned so much from this book, some of which hit me like, "Of course, I knew that." His summary account of the effects of excessive incarceration makes a lot of sense when elaborated. Here I'd like just to list the points, referring you to his pages 32-33.* The "replacement effect:" the vacancy created by imprisonment gets filled by someone else.* Mass incarceration disrupts families.* It changes the way people think about crime - young men expect that at some point they'll do time, a kind of rite of passage that reduces respect for the law.* It's extremely difficult for a released felon to find employment.* And it's very expensive: (p.34) Sixty billion dollars is the amount that the United States spends on prisons and jails every year. This does not include the costs of police and the courts.Again, in the class of "Of course, I should have known that," (see pages 112-118) "Like other politicians, prosecutors pander to voters. In the majority of jurisdictions, this means promising to get tough on crime, which translates to locking more people up. There are few risks to being overaggressive - even when prosecutors cross the line. Since 1976, approximately 120 people who received death sentences were later found to be innocent. In all these cases, prosecutors were responsible for these wrongful convictions. The number of prosecutors who have been disciplined for these egregious miscarriages of Justice? Zero. By contrast, the line prosecutor who goes against the "get tough" ethos too forcefully not only risks losing her job but also risks causing her boss to lose his.But what was really new to me was the option of Jury Nullification. (p.61) "When a jury disregards the evidence and acquits an otherwise guilty defendant, it has practiced jury nullification. The jury is saying that the law is unfair, either generally or in this particular case. The jury's decision is totally legal - indeed, the practice of jury nullification is a proud part of U.S. constitutional history."I'm trying to avoid getting carried away, but my next-to-the-last point is to refer to his two goals on p. 120. "Let's say we have two goals. First, we seek to reduce incarceration substantially. Our specific goal here is to return the United States to incarcerating "only" 1,750,000 people rather than the current 2.3 million. Our second objective is a major reduction in racial disparity in incarceration. The numerical goal here is to reduce the current eight-to-one black-white disparity to three-to-one, which is closer to the average black-white disparities in other measure of economic and social well-being"Finally, to get personal. One hopes that the disparity won't be decreased by increasing the number of "white" prisoners. I have seen the broad effects on the imprisonment of one (white) prisoner I care about. Having been on medical leave from work for a year in treatment for Hepatitis C, the latter six months of which consisted of treatment with interferon/Rebetol and Trzadone to treat depression caused by the interferon, he had completed the interferon injections but continued the Trzadone and had been back at work for two weeks. On a Sunday afternoon he consumed four beers between 3:00 and 5:00 p.m. As he reports, "My last conscious memory was about 5:30. From that point on I was in a chemically induced blackout. My next real memory is coming to in the emergency room in ... and being informed that I had caused a crash that had ended the life of two children."After release from the hospital and three weeks at home, he admitted himself to a hospital, suffering deep depression over the lives he had taken. He was not allowed to communicate to the family his deep grief. [The latter prohibition is, I believe, part of victim protection.] Advised by his lawyer to plead guilty, he was sentenced to 12 years, six for each child. At no point did he do anything but accept full responsibility for his youthful behavior that led to the Hepatitis C or for the accident. On the other hand, the judge was never presented with the information about his medical condition. Nor was the judge aware that he had no priors, confusing his record with that of his son.At a future time, another lawyer prepared a brief making those two things clear. The Judge refused to review it. He has now been in prison since 2005, during which time his marriage has ended in divorce, the son with the priors fell off the wagon, his elderly mother, single and living alone, has suffered major health problems, from open-heart surgery to back surgery to near blindness, and many things in between, rendering her incapable of leaving home on her own. In prison he has become an instructor in the restorative practices course, earned enough credits to be close to an Associates degree, and contributed his knowledge to the prison's computer system. And at his most recent hearing he was denied parole.p.s. He was not allowed to accept the book I sent him for his birthday, even though it was shrink-wrapped and sent directly from Border's Books. Nor was he allowed to receive a self-addressed stamped envelope from me so he could send me a letter.Yes, I think this is a perfect example of the futility of incarceration. This man is in no way a violent person, trying his best to care for his family from the confines of the prison. There is nothing to be learned about accepting guilt or "going straight." If nothing else, electronic monitoring would make it possible for him to care for his mother.I hope this latter story is acceptable to the author as an example of the points he is making. At the very least, I hope it's clear that I strongly urge that more people read the book.
This book addresses a question I have had for a long time: Why, with all the might and power of the U.S. has there been hardly a dent made in the war on drugs. When I saw the interview of Paul Butler on C-S[an/Book T.V., I was intrigued by both the views and the research of the author. I thought there would be answers to my questions in his work, and I was not disappointed. The sad truth is that the "fight against drugs" has an underlying purpose, which today is beginning to be openly discussed: the deliberate decimation of a target population through addiction, incarceration (often for the financial benefit of others) destruction of communities, prison release with life penalties that deny jobs, voting rights, ability to meet responsibilities to family and community, and then re-addiction--a vicious circle. Drugs are a multi million dollar business; a stone that kills more than one bird. The truth, however, is finally being exposed. According to the author, hip-hop, which many people don't understand, but may be happy to learn about, has answers that make sense.
I recently saw Paul Butler giving an interview on the Ferguson case. I was very impressed with his ideas about the judicial system and race in this country, and how we've basically become or have been a police state for some time. So I wanted to hear more from him so I looked on Amazon to see if he'd written anything, and I found Lets Get Free. What an insightful and inspiring work about real change. The kind of change that regular every day folk can do to make their/our neighborhoods safe. Definitely check it out if you want some practical solutions to everyday social problems. It's refreshing, seriously.
Let's Get Free: A Hip-Hop Theory of Justice, by Paul Butler PDF
Let's Get Free: A Hip-Hop Theory of Justice, by Paul Butler EPub
Let's Get Free: A Hip-Hop Theory of Justice, by Paul Butler Doc
Let's Get Free: A Hip-Hop Theory of Justice, by Paul Butler iBooks
Let's Get Free: A Hip-Hop Theory of Justice, by Paul Butler rtf
Let's Get Free: A Hip-Hop Theory of Justice, by Paul Butler Mobipocket
Let's Get Free: A Hip-Hop Theory of Justice, by Paul Butler Kindle
Let's Get Free: A Hip-Hop Theory of Justice, by Paul Butler PDF
Let's Get Free: A Hip-Hop Theory of Justice, by Paul Butler PDF
Let's Get Free: A Hip-Hop Theory of Justice, by Paul Butler PDF
Let's Get Free: A Hip-Hop Theory of Justice, by Paul Butler PDF
